§ 01  /  An AI workmate for civil infrastructure PRIVATE BETA · 2026

Your civil engineering workmate.

Reads the documents your project produces, checks the work, and drafts the answers.

teon reads everything your project produces: specifications, drawings, ITP submissions, RFI threads, registers, geotech reports, email correspondence. Every output traces back to its source.

Join the waitlist  → See what it does  · Onboarding Australian firms now
A1 A2 B1 B2
Lot Review Example 1 / 4
✓HP1Subgrade preparationPASS
Conformance Report signed by superintendent · TR 601 [fig-p7]
✓HP2Material conformance, Type 2.1PASS
Source MRTS05 §4.2 · TR 607 density ratios all conform [fig-p13]
⚠HP3Layer compactionINCONCLUSIVE
Superintendent Approve column not signed. Calibrated confidence 0.49 [fig-p7]
✓WP1Trim and finishPASS
✗HP4Proof rollingFAIL
No proof roll record found in submission. Recommend NCR
10 of 14 items checked · 3 awaiting your decisionReview findings →
What's the maximum slump for MRTS70 placement in coastal exposure?
MRTS70 §7.1.2 specifies a maximum slump of 120 mm at the point of placement for concrete in exposure classification C2 (coastal)1, with cross-reference to AS 1379:2007 §6.4 for slump testing methodology2. Concrete that exceeds this limit on arrival must be rejected. There is no allowance for water addition on site3.
[1]MRTS70 · Concrete§ 7.1.2
[2]AS 1379:2007 · Specification & supply§ 6.4
[3]MRTS70 · Concrete§ 7.3.1
Which drawings show the drainage layout at chainage 5200?
DWG 942579
LS-06 · Northern Shared Path · Sc 1:500
Longitudinal section covering Ch 5180–5240 with subsurface drainage marked
DWG 942581
XS-15 · Cross section · Sc 1:100
Cross section at Ch 5200 with drainage pit detail
DWG 938004
Series TC-04 · Drainage plan
Catchment plan referencing pit IDs at Ch 5200
DWG 938012
Series SD-08 · Standard detail
Pit type referenced in catchment plan above
Is the subgrade compaction at Ch 280 compliant with the project spec?
teon walks the chain · 6 linked references
›AS 1289.5.4.1Density ratio test method (modified compaction)
›MRTS04 §13.2Min CV 95% modified compaction for subgrade
›PROJ SPEC §3.4Adopts MRTS04 with no project variation
›ITP HP-3Subgrade compaction hold point, layer 1 of 3
›TR 607CV 100.0% at Ch 280, conforms
›DWG 942579Long section at Ch 280, subgrade level
Yes. Subgrade compaction at Ch 280 returned CV 100.0% (TR 607) against the 95% minimum required by MRTS04 §13.2, which the project spec adopts without variation.
Walk through
§ 02  /  What you can put teon to work onUSE CASES · 6

Six examples
from your week.

Spec lookups, lot reviews, drawing searches, RFI threads, onboarding a graduate, spotting patterns across lots. Different jobs, one workmate, all working from the documents your project already has.

Lot conformance reviews

Drafted compliance reviews

Drop in a contractor's lot submission. teon extracts the ITP, checks every hold and witness point against the spec and the evidence in the document, and drafts a complete review. You confirm, override, or flag for investigation.

→ Drafts the deliverable
Specification questions

Cited spec answers

"What's the maximum slump for MRTS70 in coastal exposure?"

Three depths: quick answer, multi-document analysis, or full engineering context with general knowledge. Every claim has the clause and the page.

→ Citations every time
Drawing intelligence

Drawings, by what's on them

"Which drawings show drainage at Ch 5200?"

Search by description, drawing number, series code, structure ID, and chainage at once. teon understands what's drawn, not just the title block.

→ Find drawings by what's on them, not just by number
Project knowledge

Onboarding for new starters

A graduate joins mid-project. Instead of a fortnight of "ask the senior engineer everything," they ask teon, get cited answers from the project's full document history, and click through to the source.

→ Knowledge handover, day one
RFI threads in context

Correspondence that joins up

"What's the latest on RFI 142 about curing time?"

teon reads the email thread, finds the disputed clause in the spec, cross-references the contractor's submission, and gives you the answer with the receipts.

→ Email + spec + drawing in one query
Cross-lot patterns

Senior-engineer synthesis

Once you've reviewed enough lots, teon surfaces the systemic. "Witness point notifications missing across all drainage lots." "This subcontractor fails compaction 40% more than average."

→ Project-wide oversight
§ 03  /  Flagship workmate task: Lot ReviewSHIPPING TODAY

The compliance review,
drafted for you.

Manual lot reviews mean reading the submission, looking up clauses, finding the test results, checking sign-offs, then writing it all up. It takes hours per lot and adds up to days every month. teon does the same work in a few minutes and hands you a drafted review to sign off.

Hours Per lot
by hand
Days Every month
across a project
Minutes Per lot
with teon

What it does

  1. Reads the lot submission and extracts the ITP checklist.
  2. Retrieves the referenced spec clauses from the library.
  3. Gathers all the evidence: test results, sign-offs, approvals, linked-lot data.
  4. Drafts a verdict per item with cited evidence and a confidence score.

Why you can trust it

A contractor's tick counts differently to a superintendent's sign-off, and teon knows the difference.

Every finding is calibrated for evidence quality, and the review can't be submitted until you've signed off every item.

What you get

A complete deliverable: per-item PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with cited evidence, an executive summary, a full audit trail of every confirm / override / flag-for-investigation decision, and cross-lot pattern reports as more reviews accumulate.

§ 04  /  Beta statusPRIVATE BETA · 2026

The first cohort
is being chosen now.

Pilot teams get direct access to the engineering team, real influence over the roadmap, and beta-rate pricing held through general availability. We're choosing the first cohort across Australian civil firms and authorities through 2026.

Direct engineering access

Conversations, not tickets.

Issues raised on a Monday are usually patched by Friday. You're not lodging support requests; you're having engineering conversations with the people building teon.

Roadmap influence

What pilots ask for, gets built.

The next feature the workmate learns is the one pilots are asking for. Pilot conversations directly shape priority across the roadmap below.

Pricing held through GA

Pilots pay what pilots paid.

Beta-rate pricing locked through general availability. No migration to GA-tier pricing when the product graduates; you keep the early-access economics.

Currently a strong fit for
  • Tier-1 civil contractors with active road or infrastructure projects
  • Civil consultancies running multiple projects across state authorities
  • State authorities and councils evaluating QA tooling for upcoming programmes
§ 05  /  Coming nextWHERE THE WORKMATE IS HEADING

teon is
learning new skills.

Here's what's coming next, and what comes after that. Each new skill is another job your team won't have to do by hand.

Next major release · mid 2026

Traffic management plan review

Drop in a contractor's traffic guidance scheme or traffic management plan. teon checks it against your project's traffic management guidelines, and drafts findings: missing signage, inadequate buffer zones, taper lengths against speed environment.

Next late 2026

Schedule progress review

Contractor's monthly progress schedule checked against the contract baseline. teon flags slipping critical-path activities, sequence violations, missing predecessor links, and logic changes that weren't formally requested. Surfaces what the schedule is telling you the contractor isn't.

Progress claim review

Contractor's monthly progress claim checked against the contract bill of quantities, schedule of rates, and work actually completed. teon flags items claimed at the wrong rate, quantities exceeding the BOQ, work not yet certified, and variations claimed without an approved order.

Later 2027

RFI review and response drafting

Read incoming RFIs from contractors, retrieve the clauses they reference, link them to related correspondence and design context, and draft a response for engineer review. For projects fielding 20–50 RFIs per month.

Drawing revision review

Each new drawing revision checked against the previous version. teon flags what changed and what's affected: lots already approved that now show inconsistencies, ITPs whose hold points reference the changed area, RFIs that asked about the same detail.

§ 06  /  Standards & specificationsPRE-LOADED · BRING YOUR OWN · UPLOAD YOUR OWN

What's pre-loaded.
What you bring. What you upload.

teon ships with the state road-authority specifications you reference every day. You bring the Australian Standards your firm licenses, and you upload everything your project produces. All three streams are indexed, cross-referenced, and citable in the same workspace.

Pre-loaded

State road-authority specs

  • Queensland TMR · MRTS & MRS series
  • NSW · Transport for NSW / RMS
  • Victoria · DTP / VicRoads
  • Western Australia · MRWA coming
  • South Australia · DIT coming
  • Tasmania · State Growth coming
  • Northern Territory · DIPL coming

Federal authorities and other jurisdictions being added through 2026. Tell us what you need.

Bring your own

Australian Standards

Australian Standards are licensed by Standards Australia and we can't redistribute them. Upload the AS standards your firm subscribes to (AS 1379, AS 3600, AS 5100, AS 1289, etc.) and teon links them into the cross-reference graph the moment they're indexed.

Upload your own

Your project corpus

Project specifications, drawings, ITP submissions, lot conformance packages, geotech reports, RFI logs, NCR registers, email correspondence, schedules, design review packs: anything your team produces. Indexed, cross-referenced, and citable in the same workspace.

Native CAD files (DWG · DXF · IFC · Revit) need to be exported to PDF first. Native CAD support is on the roadmap.
→ Your data stays yours.   Nothing you upload leaves your workspace, mixes with another customer's data, or trains an AI model.
§ 07  /  Traceable by defaultCITATIONS · EVERY CLAIM

Every claim, cited.
Every decision, yours.

Every sentence teon generates is grounded in a retrieved passage. Click a citation to jump to the exact clause. Every drafted review (lot, traffic plan, schedule, claim, or anything else) waits for your decision before submission.

01

Clause-level retrieval.

Answers cite the smallest defensible unit. Not "MRTS70" but "MRTS70 §7.1.2 with cross-reference to AS 1379 §6.4."

02

Evidence-quality calibration.

teon weighs the evidence behind a finding, not just whether the AI is sure of itself. A contractor's tick counts differently to an independent sign-off, and teon won't pass a check that hasn't been properly verified.

03

teon drafts; you approve.

Nothing leaves your workspace as a final document until an engineer has reviewed and signed off. The audit trail records every confirmation, override, and flag for investigation.

04

Reviewed by registered engineers.

Every teon skill is reviewed by RPEng and CPEng-registered engineers before it ships, and again as new outputs are tested. Engineer accountability is part of the development loop, not bolted on at the end.

SAMPLE ANSWER · DETAILED MODE
For concrete placement under MRTS70 in exposure classification C2 (coastal), the maximum slump at the point of placement is 120 mm 1, with slump testing conducted in accordance with AS 1379:2007 §6.42. Loads exceeding this on arrival must be rejected. There is no allowance for water addition on site3. The project specification adopts coastal exposure for Section 4 of the works 4, so this requirement applies to all concrete supplied to that section.
[1]MRTS70 · Concrete, §7.1.2p. 24
[2]AS 1379:2007 · Specification & supply, §6.4p. 19
[3]MRTS70 · Concrete, §7.3.1p. 26
[4]Project Spec · Section 4 General, §4.3p. 12
Sample audit trail · Lot 11117-01-US001
14:32HP-1ConfirmedSubgrade preparation, evidence on p. 7
14:34HP-2Overridden"Spec adopts AS 1379:2007, not 2018"
14:36HP-3FlaggedAwaiting independent verification
14:39WP-1ConfirmedTrim and finish
Review submitted · 4 of 4 items resolved · jw@firm.com.au
§ 08  /  PricingBY FIRM SHAPE · TALK TO US

Pricing for the
shape of your firm.

teon is priced per organisation, billed monthly. The base platform covers every user; workmate skills (Lot Review, traffic, schedule, claim) are activated separately as you need them. Find the profile closest to yours below, then talk to us for a quote that matches your project portfolio.

Small consultancy

Single-team firms,
1–3 active projects.

Per-organisation monthly subscription. Lot Review activated on demand.

  • A handful of users, sharing one workspace
  • Project-document corpus growing slowly
  • Lot Review as needed, paused between projects
  • Full base platform: chat, citations, drawings, email, audit trails
Best for: sole practitioners, small civil consultancies, project review specialists
Get a quote for your firm  →
Mid-size firm

Multi-team firms,
5–15 active projects.

Per-organisation subscription with multiple skills activated. Workspace per project, shared library across the firm.

  • Several teams across disciplines or states
  • Lot Review running monthly across active projects
  • Add schedule, claim, and other skills as they ship
  • SSO and audit logging for the team
Best for: mid-size civil consultancies, multi-project contractors, design-and-construct firms
Get a quote for your firm  →
Tier-1 / state authority

Project-funded or
portfolio-wide.

Per-organisation, per-project, or on-premise. All skills available, scaled to your portfolio.

  • Per-project subscriptions for project-funded teams
  • Portfolio-wide subscription as projects accumulate
  • On-premise licensing for full data sovereignty
  • Custom corpora, named customer engineer, API access
Best for: tier-1 contractors, state road authorities, defence-adjacent customers
Get a quote for your firm  →
How pricing works
Pricing scales with team size, active projects, and the workmate skills you activate. Setup and onboarding handled by our team. Your data is exportable any time. All pricing in AUD, ex GST. Tailored to your firm's size and project portfolio.
§ 09  /  SecuritySHIPPING · COMMITTED BY GA

Built for commercial-
in-confidence work.

Your project documents carry contractual and professional weight. teon's security posture is built into the architecture, not bolted on by policy. Each promise below is tagged for what's shipping today and what's committed by general availability.

AU
Shipping

Your data stays in Australia.

Australian-hosted by default. Enterprise customers can specify region. No data leaves Australia without explicit opt-in.

ACCESS
Shipping

Only your team sees your data.

Each organisation's workspace is isolated from every other customer's. Access is controlled per project, role, and user — only people you authorise can see what's inside.

ENCRYPT
Shipping

Encrypted, end to end.

Your documents are encrypted while stored and while moving. The same encryption used by online banking and government services.

BACKUP
Shipping

We won't lose your data.

Daily encrypted backups. If something goes wrong on our side, your project corpus and reviews are recoverable to within 24 hours.

ALERT
Shipping

We'll tell you if something goes wrong.

Documented incident response. If a security incident affects your data, you'll be notified within 24 hours with a clear account of what happened and what we're doing about it.

NO TRAIN
Shipping

Your data doesn't train AI models.

We will never use your project documents, queries, or any other data to train AI models. Not now, not ever.

LOCAL
Shipping

Air-gapped if you need it.

For organisations that need their data to stay completely inside their own network, teon can run on a local AI model installed on your infrastructure. Your documents never leave your network, never go to a cloud AI provider, and never touch the public internet.

SSO
Committed by GA

Sign-on with your identity provider.

Bring your team's logins from Microsoft, Google Workspace, or Okta. New starters get access automatically; departures lose access automatically.

§ 10  /  Frequently askedFREQUENTLY ASKED

Questions?
Answers.

Q / 01Why don't you ship Australian Standards?

Australian Standards are licensed by Standards Australia and we can't redistribute them. Upload the AS standards your firm subscribes to and teon indexes them inside your workspace. They're not shared with other tenants and they sit alongside your project corpus in the cross-reference graph.

Q / 02What documents can I upload?

Most things your project produces: specifications, drawings, ITP submissions, lot reviews, geotech reports, RFI logs, NCR registers, email correspondence, schedules, design review packs, and contracts. PDFs, Word documents, spreadsheets, slide decks, CSVs, and Outlook emails are all supported. Native CAD files (DWG / DXF / IFC / Revit) need to be exported to PDF first; native CAD support is on the roadmap.

Q / 03Can teon replace a registered engineer's sign-off?

No. teon is decision-support, not a decision-maker. Every Lot Review finding waits for an engineer's confirm / override / flag-for-investigation decision before submission, with a complete audit trail. The engineer signing off carries the professional and legal responsibility.

Q / 04Is my data used to train AI models?

No. Your project corpus is isolated per workspace and is never used to train AI models. Not now, not ever.

Q / 05Roughly what does this cost?

Pricing is per organisation, billed monthly, with the option of per-project subscriptions for project-funded customers. Specific pricing is tailored to your firm's size and the workmate skills you activate.

Q / 06How long does it take to get started?

A typical pilot deployment goes live in 1–2 weeks. We handle setup and onboarding from our end. Your team uploads project documents through the web interface or via drag-and-drop. No IT involvement is required beyond the initial account setup, which we'll coordinate with you.

Q / 07Who is behind teon?

teon is a product of Arrayen, a Brisbane-based team of engineers and problem solvers. We've stood on the sites, managed the projects, and lived with the data problems we now solve, with active research at the University of Queensland keeping the work grounded.

§ 11  /  Talk to usCOHORT 1 · APPLICATIONS OPEN

Your civil engineering
workmate is ready.

Leave your details and we'll arrange a short intro call to talk about your firm, your projects, and where teon fits.

◆ Australian-built ◆ Engineer-led ◆ Pilot teams shaping the roadmap
Tweaks teon